![]() I wished a way to colorize the black, not to change the hue of the white. I did not read your answer here, but I thanked you for the improvement in another thread, but it was not exactly what I was asking for. To make more clear (to the other readers) your reply my wishes wereĢ "chain" filters (as create sequence were several filter are used in a certain order Having the advices of G'MIC and Mathmap users would be nice to put some light on this discussion, by the way ! I may be wrong but I see this feature more as an experimental laboratory. Also, I really like the Mathmap plug-in, but I'm not really sure that people using Mathmap have a big usage of the pipeline editor on a regular basis. It would be almost more logical to integrate the G'MIC engine directly as a Mathmap component and being able to use it in their nice editor. First, it would probably burden the interface a little bit more :), and second, why not using the Mathmap plug-in for this purpose ? The filter pipeline editor in Mathmap is really great and well done, I don't see any reasons to make the same thing (and probably less well done) in G'MIC. I actually like the idea, but I would have two objections to mention. Nothing really insurmountable for a G'MIC power user :)Ībout the 2nd point. :)įinally on this point, I would conclude by saying that if you really want such presets, then as you said, it's not harder than editing a file in your text editor, and save it. Not to say about the development time required for such a thing. Looks like it will end as a complete editor for setting parameters presets, and It will probably be an overkill feature (G'MIC interface should remain as 'simple' as possible, I've already read some remarks about the fact it's already quite complex to use). Also, if we would like to do it right, it's not just 'Load Preset' and 'Save presets' that we'd need, but also 'Edit presets', 'Remove presets', probably 'Rename presets' too. ![]() So, having buttons allowing to load/save filter presets seems to me that it will burden the interface (which is already quite 'complex' regarding the other existing plug-in in G'MIC) with somehow useless functions. I may be wrong, but I think that the parameters of a filter are mostly adjusted each time differently for each different images it is applied to (and most filters have actually very few parameters to set). IMHO, this is something which would be probably used mostly by G'MIC 'power-users', since I doubt many users would like to personalize the G'MIC filters with their own set of parameters. I personally see some problems concerning your wishes, let me just expose my point of view, we can discuss about it then (of course, other advices are welcome).Ĭoncerning the 1st point : I'm still uncertain about the usefulness of the 'Load/Save preset' feature. Ronounours : Thanks to make us remember these features :) Ronounours (a group admin) edited this topic ages ago. I also would enjoy one (or two, for dual tone) sliders for adjusting the final hue of the image.Įdit by Ronounours : I've done these modifications (not for dual tones, since there would be too much in the 1.3.5.5 beta version. The 'gain' and 'offset' settings are not rather straightforward. The 'Balck and white' plugin is already very rich, I know that, but: Wish list or suggested improvements, if you were lacking ideas. It would be, so to speak, a deconvolution along a single preferred direction, like what you can see here (all that site is interesting, by the way): I add also here my idea of a "Motion Deconvolution", in order to fix images where the subject was moving. Please don't forget my 'Dust & Scratch removal' wish in this list, David! Getting a visual example definitely helps too. ![]() Second, it would be really great to post a 'before/after' image (even if roughly done by hands), or a link to a page that describes the algorithm (keeping in mind that very 'specialized' algorithms would be probably hard to implement within G'MIC). If needed, it would be preferable to edit the initial post to add informations about the wish. First, having only one single entry per one filter request. I say that because I will probably try to 'hire' some students in the future to implement G'MIC filters, and having a nicely formatted wishlist will be really helpful for them. In my opinion, it should follow some basic rules to keep it clear enough, and to ease the navigation between the different wishes. I agree, having such an 'official' wishlist is indeed an excellent idea.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |